Kelly defiant after Pentagon escalates video investigation

Mark Satter, CQ-Roll Call on Dec 16, 2025

By clicking submit, I authorize Arcamax and its affiliates to: (1) use, sell, and share my information for marketing purposes, including cross-context behavioral advertising, as described in our Privacy Policy , (2) add to information that I provide with other information like interests inferred from web page views, or data lawfully obtained from data brokers, such as past purchase or location data, or publicly available data, (3) contact me or enable others to contact me by email or other means with offers for different types of goods and services, and (4) retain my information while I am engaging with marketing messages that I receive and for a reasonable amount of time thereafter. I understand I can opt out at any time through an email that I receive, or by clicking here

WASHINGTON — Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., on Tuesday said the Pentagon’s newly announced escalation of an investigation into him was part of an effort to deter service members and government employees from speaking out against President Donald Trump.

A Defense Department official confirmed on Tuesday that the Pentagon was escalating a preliminary review of Kelly’s involvement in a video in which he urged troops to disobey unlawful orders into an “official command investigation” for “serious allegations of misconduct.”

Speaking to reporters after an all-senators briefing on counter-drug strikes in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific, Kelly said the Pentagon’s investigation into him was “bullshit” and intended to silence critics of Trump.

The November social media video on which the investigation is based also includes five other Democrats in Congress: Sen. Elissa Slotkin of Michigan and Reps. Jason Crow of Colorado, Chris Deluzio and Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania and Maggie Goodlander of New Hampshire. Slotkin served in the CIA, while the others served in the armed forces.

Kelly said Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth mentioned the investigation into him during Tuesday’s Senate briefing.

“(Hegseth) actually brought it up in the brief, oddly. Just reiterating his talking points on this when I was specifically asking him questions about strikes — which, again, shows that this is very performative for him, even in front of a group of senators,” Kelly said.

“They don’t want other people saying these kinds of things, so they’re trying to shut people up. But in this case, they picked the wrong guy, because I’m not going to shut up about this,” Kelly added.

Hegseth did not address the investigation during brief remarks after Tuesday’s all-senators briefing.

The video became a lightning rod for criticism of the lawmakers involved, who maintained that they were not responding to a particular incident but simply restating the law.

“Right now, the threats coming to our Constitution aren’t just coming from abroad but from right here at home. Our laws are clear. You can refuse illegal orders. You must refuse illegal orders,” the group said in the video, which earned a ferocious rebuke from President Donald Trump, who called it “seditious behavior” of the sort that is “punishable by death.”

In his own statement last month, Hegseth wrote that Kelly was being singled out because he is technically “retired” military and subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, unlike the others.

_____